Deep Hospitality · a working brief for a data partner
One view of the month, across fifty hotels
A hotel management company wants its monthly owner review to come from one place, not from forty slides built by hand. This brief sets out the business, the geography, why it matters now, and what a data consolidation partner would be walking into. The client is not named here.
The business, in outline
A hotel management company running about fifty hotels in more than twenty countries across Africa and the Middle East, with plans to reach a hundred. About half the hotels carry one brand and run on that brand’s central systems. The rest operate under international brands, each on the brand’s own front-office stack, or as independents. Ownership is spread across many owners, from single-asset investors to groups holding several hotels, and that is true within the main brand as well. Head office is in Dubai.
The company manages on behalf of owners, and there are many of them. Every month, each hotel accounts for itself to its owner in a business review: a pack of slides and a meeting. That review is the product the leadership team is judged on, and it’s the thing they want to change.
Why now
40 to 80 slides
per hotel, per month, assembled by hand from eight departments
10 to 20 hours
of management time to build one pack. One cluster’s own estimate.
Day 15 to 20
before the owner reads about a month that ended on day 30
5 to 10 slides
is what owners told us they want. Position, the gap, the next three months.
The numbers in the pack arrive as pictures pasted from other systems, so nothing can be compared against budget or last year without rebuilding it by hand. Errors reach owners. The general manager writes the commentary slide by slide. Corporate reads it, sends questions back, and the slides are corrected. By then this month is half gone.
Three ledgers, several front-office systems, a revenue planning tool mid-rollout, and one Excel template filled in by a person every month. Nothing talks to anything. That’s the burning platform: the leadership team has asked for warnings before a number turns red, and no dashboard on its own can give them that until the data sits in one connected place.
How the month is built today
Drawn from six general manager interviews, two owner conversations, and the corporate finance team.
The systems underneath
One brand with central systems on one side; brand stacks and independents on the other. Three ledgers between them. Owners differ hotel by hotel on both sides.
What that means for consolidation
Charts of accounts differ from hotel to hotel, and taken-over hotels brought their own. Mapping to one chart produces figures that won’t match history, and owners will notice.
The planning tool takes front-office data at market-code level only. No rate code, room type, agent, or company. Its finance feed is a monthly file upload, not an interface.
Brand hotels can’t connect a third-party tool to the brand’s systems without the brand’s approval. That takes time and sets which hotels can be first.
Guest feedback, standards, meeting minutes, and marketing live outside every finance system and are part of what owners ask about.
Internet at some hotels is slow. Anything property-facing has to work on a phone, on a poor connection.
Where it’s going
The planning tool stays at property level. One data layer sits above it. An assistant reads that layer so the leadership team gets warnings, not dashboards. A person approves before anything reaches a property or an owner.
The owner review itself is already designed: three levels of detail, from fourteen slides down to only what moved, built on a real month of a real hotel. The content is settled. What’s missing is the plumbing that fills it without a person re-typing.
What we’d like to talk about
We’re looking for a partner who consolidates hotel operating data for a living, to work alongside us on the layer in the middle. Specifically:
Connecting three ledgers, several front-office systems, and a planning tool into one model, hotel by hotel, where a scheduled export is often all that’s available
One chart of accounts across the estate, with a clear way to show owners why restated figures differ from history
A trial on one hotel and one corporate view, inside a month, before any wider commitment
An open read interface at the end of it, so the review assembles itself and an assistant can answer questions from the same data
No lock-in: the client owns the model and the data, and can take both out
If this is the kind of work you do, we’d welcome a conversation.