A hotel management company wants its monthly owner review to come from one place, not from forty slides built by hand. This brief sets out the business, the geography, why it matters now, and what a data consolidation partner would be walking into. The client is not named.
The business
Fifty hotels, twenty countries, many owners
The estate
A hotel management company running about fifty hotels in more than twenty countries across Africa and the Middle East, with plans to reach a hundred. About half the hotels carry one brand and run on that brand’s central systems. The rest operate under international brands, each on the brand’s own front-office stack, or as independents. Head office is in Dubai.
The owners
Ownership is spread across many owners, from single-asset investors to groups holding several hotels, and that is true within the main brand as well. The company manages on their behalf. Every month, each hotel accounts for itself to its owner in a business review: a pack of slides and a meeting. That review is the product the leadership team is judged on, and it’s the thing they want to change.
Why now
The month is built by hand, and read when it is half over
40to 80
slides per hotel, per month, assembled from eight departments
10to 20 hrs
of management time for one pack. One cluster’s own estimate.
15to 20
days into the next month before the owner reads it
5to 10
slides is what owners asked for: position, the gap, the next three months
The numbers arrive as pictures pasted from other systems, so nothing can be compared against budget or last year without rebuilding it by hand. Errors reach owners. The general manager writes the commentary slide by slide. Corporate reads it, sends questions back, and the slides are corrected.
Three ledgers, several front-office systems, a revenue planning tool mid-rollout, and one Excel template filled in by a person every month. Nothing talks to anything. The leadership team has asked for warnings before a number turns red, and no dashboard on its own can give them that until the data sits in one connected place.
How the month is built today
Eight departments, one person collating, three hand-offs
Drawn from six general manager interviews, two owner conversations, and the corporate finance team.
The systems underneath
Two halves of the estate, three ledgers, one template
One brand with central systems on one side; brand stacks and independents on the other. Owners differ hotel by hotel on both sides.
What that means for consolidation
1Charts of accounts differ from hotel to hotel, and taken-over hotels brought their own. Mapping to one chart produces figures that won’t match history, and owners will notice.
2The planning tool takes front-office data at market-code level only. No rate code, room type, agent, or company. Its finance feed is a monthly file upload, not an interface.
3Brand hotels need the brand’s approval before a third-party tool can connect to its systems. That takes time and sets which hotels can go first.
4Guest feedback, standards, minutes, and marketing live outside every finance system and are part of what owners ask about.
5Internet at some hotels is slow. Anything property-facing has to work on a phone, on a poor connection.
Where it is going
The tool stays. One layer sits above it. People decide.
The planning tool stays at property level. One data layer sits above it. An assistant reads that layer so the leadership team gets warnings, not dashboards. A person approves before anything reaches a property or an owner.
The owner review itself is already designed: three levels of detail, from fourteen slides down to only what moved, built on a real month of a real hotel. The content is settled. What’s missing is the plumbing that fills it without a person re-typing.
What we would like to talk about
A partner for the layer in the middle
We’re looking for someone who consolidates hotel operating data for a living, to work alongside us. Specifically:
1Connecting three ledgers, several front-office systems, and a planning tool into one model, hotel by hotel, where a scheduled export is often all that’s available
2One chart of accounts across the estate, with a clear way to show owners why restated figures differ from history
3A trial on one hotel and one corporate view, inside a month, before any wider commitment
4An open read interface at the end of it, so the review assembles itself and an assistant can answer questions from the same data
5No lock-in: the client owns the model and the data, and can take both out
If this is the kind of work you do, we’d welcome a conversation.
Shared in confidence. The client is not named and no hotel, owner, or performance figure appears on this page. Figures are as described to us in discovery, not audited.